LU B S, WANG J, ZHANG B, et al. Path following control of large ship towing based on hierarchical anti-disturbance control strategy[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2025, 20(X): 1–14 (in Chinese). DOI: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.03936
Citation: LU B S, WANG J, ZHANG B, et al. Path following control of large ship towing based on hierarchical anti-disturbance control strategy[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2025, 20(X): 1–14 (in Chinese). DOI: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.03936

Path following control of large ship towing based on hierarchical anti-disturbance control strategy

More Information
  • Received Date: May 22, 2024
  • Revised Date: July 10, 2024
  • Accepted Date: July 10, 2024
  • Available Online: July 30, 2024
© 2025 The Authors. Published by Editorial Office of Chinese Journal of Ship Research. Creative Commons License
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
  • Objectives 

    The safety of towing large ships to designated sea areas is of great significance for maritime navigation. However, traditional towing operations, which rely on manual scheduling, face challenges in complex marine environments. The towing system is characterized by non-linearity, large inertia, and under-actuation, making it vulnerable to external disturbances. This research aims to enhance the disturbance rejection performance of underactuated autonomous tugboats during large ship towing, aiming to ensure the safe navigation of the towing system along the planned path.

    Methods 

    Firstly, a three-degree-of-freedom coupled motion mathematical model of the towing system is established based on the ship MMG model, taking into account the surge, sway, and yaw motions of the ships in the horizontal plane. This model comprehensively considers the external disturbances and towing forces acting on the towed ship and the tugboat, providing a solid foundation for the design of subsequent control strategies. Secondly, a towed line-of-sight (TLOS) guidance method suitable for towing navigation is proposed. This method calculates the desired heading of the towed ship based on the target path deviation, the position, and heading of the towed ship. It converts the path-tracking problem into speed and heading control problems, thereby simplifying the control process. Then, a hierarchical anti-disturbance control strategy (HAD-CS) is designed. In the control layer of the towed ship, a top-level anti-disturbance control method combining linear active disturbance rejection control (LADRC) and sliding mode control (SMC) is designed. LADRC is used to control the heading of the towed ship by calculating the desired tow-cable angle based on the heading deviation and compensating for the heading disturbance. SMC based on the extended state observer (ESO-SMC) is used to control the longitudinal speed by observing and compensating for external disturbances, outputting the required longitudinal force. The output of the top-level control, which includes the desired tow-cable angle and force, is then transmitted to the bottom-level tugboat controller.In the control layer of the tugboat, a bottom-level anti-disturbance control method based on ESO-SMC is designed. The output of the top-level anti-disturbance control is used as the input to the bottom-level control. Considering the constraints of the tow-cable and thrusters, the method designs separate heading and speed controllers for the tugboat. For heading control, a sliding-mode surface is designed based on the heading error, and the control law is derived by estimating the disturbance. For speed control, a sliding-mode surface is designed based on the speed error, and the control law is derived by estimating the longitudinal disturbance.

    Results 

    Simulation experiments are carried out to compare the proposed HAD-CS with the existing single-level anti-disturbance control strategy (SAD-CS). The results show that both control strategies can follow the reference path. However, the HAD-CS shows better performance. In terms of path-tracking performance, the average lateral error of the towed ship under the HAD-CS is 1.448 m, while under the SAD-CS it is 1.743 m. The path-keeping performance of the towed ship under the HAD-CS improves by about 16.9% compared with the SAD-CS. In the presence of sudden constant disturbances, the HAD-CS ensures that the towed ship remains on the desired path, whereas the SAD-CS cannot. In terms of heading-keeping performance, during turns and in the presence of sudden disturbances, the HAD-CS enables the heading angles of the towed ship and the tugboat to converge to the target heading more quickly, with smaller overshoots. The average heading error of the towed ship decreases by 34.6%, and that of the tugboat decreases by 51.9%. In terms of speed-keeping performance, under the SAD-CS, the speeds of the two-ship towing system fluctuate greatly, especially during turns and in the presence of sudden disturbances. In contrast, under the HAD-CS, the speed error of the tugboat decreases by 52.2%, and that of the towed ship decreases by 68%. The ships can quickly converge to the predetermined speed with smaller fluctuations.

    Conclusions 

    The proposed HAD-CS can effectively compensate for the disturbances acting on the towed ship and the tugboat due to external environmental factors. It significantly improves the anti-disturbance ability of the towing system, verifying the feasibility of autonomous tugboats towing large ships. This research provides a theoretical reference for the application of autonomous towing by tugboats. Future research can focus on developing a more accurate tow-cable model, fully considering the impact of tow-cable motion on the system and external environmental disturbances, and introducing neural network methods to estimate disturbances to further enhance the anti-disturbance performance of the hierarchical anti-disturbance control strategy.

  • [1]
    谢涵清. 船舶自主靠泊研究[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2020. doi: 10.27307/d.cnki.gsjtu.2020.000960.

    XIE H Q. Autonomous berthing system for ships[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2020. doi: 10.27307/d.cnki.gsjtu.2020.000960 (in Chinese).
    [2]
    中国交通新闻网. 全球首艘自主伴航拖轮投产启用[EB/OL]. (2024-04-22)[2024-04-25]. https://www.mot.gov.cn/jiaotongyaowen/202404/t20240422_4136592.html.

    China Transportation News. The world's first autonomous escort tugboat is put into production and commissioned[EB/OL]. (2024-04-22)[2024-04-25]. https://www.mot.gov.cn/jiaotongyaowen/202404/t20240422_4136592.html (in Chinese).
    [3]
    惠恩琳. 超大型满载无动力散货船舶靠泊的关键技术分析——以大连港18万吨级“胜利”轮无动力靠泊矿石大码头操作为例[J]. 珠江水运, 2020(16): 55–58.

    HUI E L. Technical analysis of key technologies for berthing of ultra-large unpowered bulk cargo ships at full load—an illustrative case study for academic purposes is the operation of the 180 000-ton “sheng li” vessel berthing at the large ore terminal in Dalian port[J]. Pearl River Water Transport, 2020(16): 55–58 (in Chinese).
    [4]
    李诗杰, 徐诚祺, 刘佳仑, 等. 船舶自抗扰无模型自适应航迹控制[J]. 中国舰船研究, 2024, 19(1): 280–289. doi: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.03226

    LI S J, XU C Q, LIU J L, et al. Tracking control of ships based on ADRC-MFAC[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2024, 19(1): 280–289 (in both Chinese and English). doi: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.03226
    [5]
    吴文涛, 彭周华, 王丹, 等. 基于扩张状态观测器的双桨推进无人艇抗干扰目标跟踪控制[J]. 中国舰船研究, 2021, 16(1): 128–135. doi: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.01665

    WU W T, PENG Z H, WANG D, et al. ESO based anti-disturbance target tracking control for twin-screw unmanned surface vehicle[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2021, 16(1): 128–135(in both Chineseand English). doi: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.01665
    [6]
    LI M C, GUO C, YU H M. Filtered extended state observer based line-of-sight guidance for path following of unmanned surface vehicles with unknown dynamics and disturbances[J]. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 178401–178412. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2958855
    [7]
    SUN N, REN G, LIU H T. FESO-based line-of-sight guidance law for path following of unmanned surface vehicles with environmental disturbances[C]//Proceedings of 2021 China Automation Congress (CAC). Beijing: IEEE, 2021: 6583−6588. doi: 10.1109/CAC53003.2021.9727738.
    [8]
    王巍凯, 苏航, 张恩华. 欠驱动无人艇固定时间轨迹跟踪控制[J]. 中国舰船研究, 2023, 18(增刊1): 1–8. doi: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.03088

    WANG W K, SU H, ZHANG E H. Fixed-time trajectory tracking control for underactuated surface vessels[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2023, 18(Supp 1): 1–8 (in Chinese). doi: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.03088
    [9]
    GONZALEZ-GARCIA A, CASTAÑEDA H. Guidance and control based on adaptive sliding mode strategy for a USV subject to uncertainties[J]. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 2021, 46(4): 1144–1154. doi: 10.1109/JOE.2021.3059210
    [10]
    ZHENG Y M, TAO J, HARTIKAINEN J, et al. DDPG based LADRC trajectory tracking control for underactuated unmanned ship under environmental disturbances[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2023, 271: 113667. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.113667
    [11]
    DU Z, NEGENBORN R R, REPPA V. Review of floating object manipulation by autonomous multi-vessel systems[J]. Annual Reviews in Control, 2023, 55: 255–278. doi: 10.1016/j.arcontrol.2022.10.003
    [12]
    CHEN L Y, HOPMAN H, NEGENBORN R R. Distributed model predictive control for cooperative floating object transport with multi-vessel systems[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2019, 191: 106515. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106515
    [13]
    DU Z, NEGENBORN R R, REPPA V. Cooperative multi-agent control for autonomous ship towing under environmental disturbances[J]. IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica, 2021, 8(8): 1365–1379. doi: 10.1109/JAS.2021.1004078
    [14]
    DU Z, REPPA V, NEGENBORN R R. Cooperative control of autonomous tugs for ship towing[J]. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2020, 53(2): 14470–14475. doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.1448
    [15]
    HAJIEGHRARY H, KULARATNE D, ANI HSIEH M. Differential geometric approach to trajectory planning: cooperative transport by a team of autonomous marine vehicles[C]//Proceedings of 2018 Annual American Control Conference (ACC). Milwaukee: IEEE, 2018: 858–863. doi: 10.23919/ACC.2018.8430951.
    [16]
    HAJIEGHRARY H, KULARATNE D, ANI HSIEH M. Cooperative transport of a buoyant load: a differential geometric approach[C]//Proceedings of 2017 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). Vancouver: IEEE, 2017: 2158–2163. doi: 10.1109/IROS.2017.8206033.
    [17]
    TAO J, DU L, DEHMER M, et al. Path following control for towing system of cylindrical drilling platform in presence of disturbances and uncertainties[J]. ISA Transactions, 2019, 95: 185–193. doi: 10.1016/j.isatra.2019.04.030
    [18]
    ZHENG Y M, TAO J, SUN Q L, et al. An intelligent course keeping active disturbance rejection controller based on double deep Q-network for towing system of unpowered cylindrical drilling platform[J]. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 2021, 31(17): 8463–8480. doi: 10.1002/rnc.5740
    [19]
    ISMAIL M M, CHALHOUB N G, PILIPCHUK V. Dynamics and control of a two-ship ensemble connected by a massless towline[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2021, 234: 109295. doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2021.109295
    [20]
    LEE D H, CHAKIR S, KIM Y B, et al. Control system design for vessel towing system by activating rudders of the towed vessel[J]. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 2020, 12: 943–956. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2020.11.008
    [21]
    贾欣乐, 杨盐生. 船舶运动数学模型——机理建模与辨识建模[M]. 大连: 大连海事大学出版社, 1999.

    YANG X L, YANG Y S. Mathematical models for ship motion: principle-based modeling and identification modeling[M]. Dalian: Dalian Maritime University Press, 1999 (in Chinese).
    [22]
    SANO M. Mathematical model and simulation of cooperative manoeuvres among a ship and tugboats[J]. Brodogradnja, 2023, 74(2): 127–148. doi: 10.21278/brod74207
    [23]
    韩京清. 自抗扰控制技术[J]. 前沿科学, 2007(1): 24–31. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8128.2007.01.004

    HAN J Q. Auto disturbances rejection control technique[J]. Frontier Science, 2007(1): 24–31 (in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8128.2007.01.004
  • Related Articles

    [1]CHEN Haoyu, XU Haixiang, WEI Xiao, WANG Jian, CHEN Wei. KFESO-based composite anti-disturbance control for distributed cooperative path following of unmanned surface vehicles[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2025, 20(1): 191-202. DOI: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.03983
    [2]HU Xin, GONG Qingtao, ZHU Guibing, HAN Guojie, WANG Yuan. Event-triggered synchronization anti-disturbance control method for ship replenishment[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2024, 19(5): 87-94. DOI: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.03440
    [3]SUN Shoutai, TANG Bing, XUE Yali, SUN Li. Rapid diagnosis and active disturbance rejection control of compressor surge based on hybrid deep learning[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2024, 19(2): 187-196. DOI: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.03259
    [4]YANG Ling, XU Haixiang, YU Wenzhao. Null-space-based active disturbance rejection control allocation for ship autonomous berthing[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2024, 19(1): 128-136. DOI: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.03488
    [5]LIU Yang, JIA Hongchun, LIU Lu, WANG Dan, PENG Zhouhua. Anti-disturbance optimal coverage control of ASVs[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2023, 18(1): 67-77. DOI: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.02492
    [6]CHEN Zongbin, LIAO Jian, LIU Banghui. Application research on active disturbance rejection control algorithm and test of electro-hydraulic steering gear[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2022, 17(1): 166-175. DOI: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.02222
    [7]WU Wentao, PENG Zhouhua, WANG Dan, LIU Lu, JIANG Jizhou, REN Shuai. ESO based anti-disturbance target tracking control for twin-screw unmanned surface vehicle[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2021, 16(1): 128-135. DOI: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.01665
    [8]JIN Yue, YU Menghong, YUAN Wei. Application of novel linear active disturbance rejection control in dynamic positioning control system of vessels[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2017, 12(1): 134-139. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3185.2017.01.020
    [9]ZHAO Rui, YU Kun, ZHENG Wencheng, XIANG Xianbo. 无人水下航行器分布式运动控制系统设计与仿真验证[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2014, 9(6): 92-99. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3185.2014.06.016
    [10]Song Dongan, Yi Xueqin, Wen Dinge. 金属挡板抑制辐射干扰的机理研究[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2007, 2(1): 46-48. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3185.2007.01.010

Catalog

    Article views (182) PDF downloads (32) Cited by()
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return