以功能为导向的舰船建造质量控制方法

王鸿东; 梁晓锋; 余平; 易宏; 张裕芳

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-3185.2016.05.020

以功能为导向的舰船建造质量控制方法

王鸿东^1,2,
梁晓锋^1,2, ,,
余平³,
易宏^1,2,
张裕芳^1,2

1 上海交通大学海洋工程国家重点实验室, 上海 200240;
2 高新船舶与深海开发装备协同创新中心, 上海 200240;
3 江南造船(集团)有限责任公司总装部, 上海 201913

详细信息

作者简介:
王鸿东,男,1989年生,博士生。研究方向:舰船可靠性,水动力学。E-mail:whd302@sjtu.edu.cn

通讯作者:
梁晓锋(通信作者),男,1976年生,博士,助理研究员。研究方向:舰船可靠性。E-mail:liang_xiaofeng@sjtu.edu.cn

中图分类号: U671.97
计量
- 文章访问数: 343
- HTML全文浏览量: 62
- PDF下载量: 182
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2016-02-29
- 网络出版日期: 2023-02-10
- 刊出日期: 2016-10-07

A function-oriented quality control method for ship construction

1 State Key Laboratory of Ocean Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China;
2 Collaborative Innovation Center for Advanced Ship and Deep-Sea Exploration, Shanghai 200240, China;
3 Final Assembly Department, Jiangnan Shipyard(Group) Co., Ltd., Shanghai 201913, China

以功能为导向的舰船建造质量控制方法王鸿东，采用知识共享署名4.0国际许可协议进行许可。

摘要

摘要: 长期以来，由于舰船建造工程浩大、过程复杂、工艺繁多，人们对于建造质量如何影响舰船可靠性缺乏系统性的研究。为实现对考虑建造质量影响的舰船可靠性的科学预测和有效控制，从舰船总体功能的角度出发，在现代造船模式背景下，针对舰船建造提出一种以功能为导向的质量控制（FOQC）方法。融合舰船目标功能、质量参数、建造工艺因素，提出舰船建造可靠性预测模型。建立工艺—质量参数及质量参数—特征功能可靠性模型，对预测模型进行量化计算，获得建造质量对舰船可靠性影响的定性与定量分析，并依据分析结果，对关键质量点与关键工艺环节进行控制与优化。以某舰船轴系安装为实例进行分析，验证了方法的可行性与有效性，可为舰船建造质量的定量化检验与评价提供基础性方法的原理指导。
- 舰船可靠性 /
- 功能 /
- 质量 /
- 工艺 /
- FOQC
Abstract: As ship construction is a large-scale, complex and problematic process, it lacks systematic research into how construction quality influences ship reliability. Aiming at the purpose of predicting and controlling ship reliability, this paper proposes a Function-Oriented Quality Control(FOQC) method to manage a ship's overall functions under modern ship-building conditions. Based on the system reliability theory, a reliability prediction model for ship construction composed of such factors as ship function, quality parameters and building process is proposed. We establish a quality-function reliability model and a process-quality model to both qualitatively and quantitatively calculate the impact of construction quality on ship reliability. According to the results, the control of key quality factors and processes can be implemented. The feasibility and effectiveness of the FOQC method are validated by a case involving the shafting installation of a ship.
- ship reliability /
- function /
- quality /
- process /
- FOQC

HTML全文

参考文献(14)

[1]	周思醒, 杨建军, 胡涛. 舰船总体任务可靠性建模新方法[J]. 中国舰船研究, 2010, 5(1): 52-55. ZHOU Sixing, YANG Jianjun, HU Tao. A new method to establish reliability model for overall mission of ships[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2010, 5(1): 52-55.
[2]	梁晓锋. 以顶层参数为目标的舰船可靠性关键技术研究[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2011. LIANG Xiaofeng. Research on key technology for warship reliability analysis aiming at top-level parameters[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2011.
[3]	沈国鉴, 易宏. 舰船可靠性设计探讨[J]. 舰船科学技术, 1990(5): 23-29. SHEN Guojian, YI Hong. Ship reliability design[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 1990 (5): 23-29.
[4]	DURU O, HUANG S T, BULUT E, et al. Multi-layer quality function deployment(QFD) approach for improving the compromised quality satisfaction under the agency problem: a 3D QFD design for the asset selection problem in the shipping industry[J]. Quality and Quantity, 2013, 47(4): 2259-2280.
[5]	郭婧宜, 孙宇锋, 吴寒雪, 等. 基于STT与模糊QFD 的装备质量特性分解方法[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报, 2012, 38(8): 1090-1095. GUO Jingyi, SUN Yufeng, WU Hanxue, et al. Decomposition method of equipment quality characteristic based on STT and fuzzy QFD[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2012, 38 (8): 1090-1095.
[6]	张居凤, 汪玉, 方志刚. 基于QFD/SPA 的武器装备需求分析方法[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 2012, 32 (9): 2016-2021. ZHANG Jufeng, WANG Yu, FANG Zhigang. Requirements analysis of weapons and equipment based on QFD and SPA methods[J]. Systems Engineering-Theory and Practice, 2012, 32(9): 2016-2021.
[7]	KWONG C K, BAI H. Determining the importance weights for the customer requirements in QFD using a fuzzy AHP with an extent analysis approach[J]. IIE Transactions, 2003, 35(7): 619-626.
[8]	陈宁, 曲浩. 中小型船厂的建造计划管理及优化方法研究[J]. 中国舰船研究, 2009, 4(1): 77-80. CHEN Ning, QU Hao. Management and optimization of building program for medium/small size shipyards[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2009, 4(1): 77-80.
[9]	JOHNSON K G, KHAN M K. A study into the use of the process failure mode and effects analysis (PFMEA) in the automotive industry in the UK[J]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2003, 139 (1/2/3): 348-356.
[10]	黄一民. 舰船建造工艺失效模式及影响分析方法简介[J]. 船舶, 2005(6): 35-38. HUANG Yimin. Methods of failure mode and affect analysis for shipbuilding techniques[J]. Ship and Boat, 2005 (6): 35-38.
[11]	易宏. 舰船总体可靠性通用模型及舰船可靠性工程方法研究[D]. 上海: 上海交通大学, 2003. YI Hong. Research on ship overall reliability model and engineering approach[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Jiao Tong University, 2003.
[12]	LIANG X F, YI H, ZHANG Y F, et al. Reliability and safety analysis of an underwater dry maintenance cabin[J]. Ocean Engineering, 2010, 37(2/3): 268-276.
[13]	蒋平. 机械制造的工艺可靠性研究[D]. 长沙: 国防科学技术大学, 2010. JIANG Ping. Research on process reliability for manufacturing[D]. Changsha: National University of Defense Technology, 2010.
[14]	陈生春, 陈华伟. 基于专家权重和风险矩阵的潜艇集体逃生舱风险评估方法[J]. 中国舰船研究, 2013, 8(2): 13-16. CHEN Shengchun, CHEN Huawei. A risk evaluation model of submarine collective escaping capsules based on the expert weight and risk matrix[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2013, 8(2): 13-16.