Contrast experiments on the propeller noise of the Kappel propeller and the conventional propeller
-
摘要: 为检验Kappel桨的噪声性能,在海军工程大学空泡水洞进行背景噪声测量及2种桨模噪声对比试验.本次试验共设计16组工况,分别测量2种桨在无空泡和有空泡时的噪声.由测量结果分析可知,海军工程大学空泡水洞的声学性能满足试验要求,噪声信号在1~20 kHz范围内可获得较高的信噪比.无空泡时,Kappel桨与传统桨的辐射噪声相当;在相同转速空泡数σn下,Kappel桨的空化辐射噪声高于传统螺旋桨的,同时观察其空泡形态,与传统螺旋桨相比Kappel桨的空泡形态要为剧烈,表明在空泡性能方面Kappel桨要低于传统螺旋桨,在Kappel桨的设计过程中应综合考虑螺距与拱弧的关系以改善Kappel桨的空泡性能.Abstract: To test the noise performance of the Kappel propeller, background noise and propeller noise contrast tests are carried out in the NUE cavitation tunnel. Both wet condition noise and the cavitation noise of the two propellers are measured in the tests under sixteen different working conditions. The analysis based on the measurement results indicates that the acoustics performance of the NEU cavitation tunnel satisfies the requirements of the tests, and higher signal-to-noise ratio can be achieved in the frequency range between 1 kHz and 20 kHz. The SPL of the Kappel propeller noise equals to the conventional propeller noise under the wet condition. With the same cavitation number, the SPL of the Kappel propeller cavitation noise is higher than that of the conventional propeller. Meanwhile, the pattern of the Kappel propeller cavitation is more precise than that of the conventional propeller. It is concluded that the cavitation performance of the Kappel propeller is poorer than that of the conventional propeller. To improve the cavitation performance, the relationship between pitch and camber should be comprehensively considered in the process of Kappel propeller designing.
-
Keywords:
- cavitation noise /
- Kappel propeller /
- cavitation tunnel
-
-
[1] 杨勇.螺旋桨噪声数值模拟与试验研究[D].武汉:海 军工程大学,2012. [2] 王睿.面元法分析及其应用于Kapple桨的相关研究[D].武汉:海军工程大学,2013. [3] 黄意程.非平面螺桨之效率与空化性能探讨[D].台 湾:国立台湾海洋大学,2008. [4] 荘靖秋.非平面螺桨之效率与空化性能探讨II[D].台 湾:国立台湾海洋大学,2009. [5] 钟佩珊.非平面螺桨之效率与空化性能探讨Ⅲ[D]. 台湾:国立台湾海洋大学,2010. [6] INUKAI Y. A development of a propeller with backward tip raked fin[C]/ Third International Symposium on Marine Propulsion smp'13. Tasmania,Australia,2013. [7] ANDERSEN P,FRIESCH J,KAPPEL J J,et al. Development of a marine propeller with nonplanar lifting surfaces[J]. Marine Technology and SNAME News, 2005,42(3):144-158. [8] 吴俊明.大翼尖倾斜螺桨之设计与空间几何表示[D].台湾:国立台湾海洋大学,2008. [9] ARNDT R E A. Internation symposium on cavitation noise[M]. The Amercian Society of Mechaical Engineering,1982 [10] 张永坤,熊鹰,赵小龙.螺旋桨无空泡噪声预报[J]. 噪声与振动控制,2008,28(1):44-47. ZHANG Yongkun,XIONG Ying,ZHAO Xiaolong. Prediction of propeller non-cavitations noise[J]. Noise and Vibration Control,2008,28(1):44-47. [11] 王睿,熊鹰,王展智.适用于Kappel桨的面元法尾涡 模型[J].舰船科学技术,2014,36(10):68-72. WANG Rui,XIONG Ying,WANG Zhanzhi. A wake model suitable for the analysis of Kappel propellers with surface panel method[J]. Ship Science and Technology,2014,36(10):68-72. [12] HSIN C Y,CHANG K K,CHENG Y H,et al. The analysis and design of energy-saving propulsors by computational methods[C]/ The 3rd Pan Asian Association of Maritime Engineering Societies and Advanced Maritime Engineering Conference. Chiba,Japan,2008. [13] CHENG H J,CHIEN Y C,HSIN C Y,et al. A numerical comparison of end-plate effect propellers and conventional propellers[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics,2010,22(5):495-500. -
期刊类型引用(3)
1. 秦登辉,黄桥高,潘光,李福正,韩鹏. 泵喷推进器水动力性能实验研究. 西北工业大学学报. 2023(03): 601-611 . 百度学术
2. 秦耀明,赖海清,严姬,李明敏. Kappel螺旋桨变参数水动力性能研究. 舰船科学技术. 2020(09): 40-43 . 百度学术
3. 朱江波,傅江妍,陈曦,冯观. 均匀流中螺旋桨无空泡噪声数值预报方法验证分析. 舰船科学技术. 2017(11): 23-27+32 . 百度学术
其他类型引用(0)
计量
- 文章访问数: 577
- HTML全文浏览量: 65
- PDF下载量: 245
- 被引次数: 3