地效翼船纵向动稳性的数值模拟研究

Numerical simulation study on longitudinal dynamic stability of wing-in-ground-effect craft

  • 摘要: 【目的】和飞机相比,地效翼船利用地效增升原理,不但节省燃料,还具有成本低和更安全的优势。但是,地效翼船的纵向动稳性差,对设计构成严重挑战。为此,常采用双翼(翼-尾构型)来增强纵向动稳定性。确定该稳定性区间对于设计至关重要。【方法】首先采用有限体积法和SST k-ω 湍流模型求解雷诺平均N-S方程研究NACA4412翼型单翼的气动性能和纵向静稳性,并通过转轴原理探究重心纵向位置对静稳性的影响。然后对双翼地效翼船的动稳性进行研究,利用平均对数衰减率判断其动稳性。并通过流场分析等方法探究各因素作用机理。【结果】结果表明,数值模拟的升力系数CL和阻力系数CD均与实验吻合良好;重心往上游移动有利于单翼静稳性的满足,但在飞高0.1C至0.5C(C为前翼弦长),攻角2°至10°范围内均不能使静稳性判断条件(3)满足;在一定条件下,前翼攻角为6°至10°,前翼相对飞高为0.1至0.15范围内,地效翼船运动具有动稳性。而重心纵向位置、前后翼翼尖纵向间隔和尾翼攻角的选取同时受到力矩平衡和纵向动态稳定性的限制。【结论】以NACA4412翼型作为前翼的双翼地效翼船具有纵向动稳性的区间比较有限,其不具备飞高的能力。双翼地效翼船的纵向动稳性受到多因素影响,并且纵向动稳性与力矩平衡的实现对许多参数的要求是相互冲突的。

     

    Abstract: Abstract:Objective Compared with aircraft, wing-in-ground-effect (WIG) craft utilize the ground effect lift augmentation principle, which not only saves fuel but also offers advantages of low cost and enhanced safety. However, WIG craft suffer from poor longitudinal dynamic stability, posing a severe challenge to their design. For this reason, a biplane configuration (wing-tail layout) is commonly adopted to improve longitudinal dynamic stability. Determining the stability range is critical to the design process. Method First, the finite volume method and the SST k-ω turbulence model are employed to solve the Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) equations, investigating the aerodynamic performance and longitudinal static stability of a single wing with the NACA4412 airfoil. The influence of the longitudinal center-of-gravity (CG) position on static stability is explored using the pivot-point theory. Subsequently, the dynamic stability of the biplane WIG craft is studied, and the mean logarithmic decrement is used to evaluate its dynamic stability. The mechanisms of various influencing factors are analyzed through flow-field visualization and other methods. Results The results show that the numerically simulated lift coefficient (CL) and drag coefficient (CD) are in good agreement with experimental data. Moving the center of gravity upstream benefits the static stability of the single wing, but the static stability criterion (3) cannot be satisfied within the range of 0.1C to 0.5C flying height (where C denotes the chord length of the front wing) and 2° to 10° angle of attack. Under certain conditions, the WIG craft exhibits dynamic stability when the front-wing angle of attack is 6° to 10° and the relative flying height of the front wing is 0.1 to 0.15. Moreover, the selection of the longitudinal CG position, the longitudinal tip gap between the front and rear wings, and the tail-wing angle of attack is constrained by both moment equilibrium and longitudinal dynamic stability. Conclusion The longitudinal dynamic stability range of biplane WIG craft using the NACA4412 airfoil as the front wing is relatively narrow, and such craft lack altitude-maneuvering capability. The longitudinal dynamic stability of biplane WIG craft is affected by multiple factors, and the requirements for achieving longitudinal dynamic stability often conflict with those for moment equilibrium across many parameters.

     

/

返回文章
返回