局部载荷与船体梁载荷联合作用下的船舶烟囱区域结构强度校核方法研究

  • 摘要: 目的 针对靠近船中布置的烟囱结构强度校核中,局部载荷和船体梁载荷的联合作用导致的传统烟囱区域结构校核方法的适用性问题,提出两种新的针对靠近船中布置的烟囱结构强度校核方法。方法 采用四种方法进行烟囱区域结构强度进行评估,分别是传统尾机型烟囱强度校核方法即仅考虑局部载荷的方法、现行的针对船中烟囱的结构强度校核方法即单独计算局部载荷和船体梁载荷并进行应力叠加的方法以及两种新的校核方法:局部载荷和船体梁载荷进行排列组合工况方法以及在局部载荷和船体梁载荷组合工况的前提下进行采用简化方法进行船体梁载荷修正的方法,并和全船有限元计算结果进行比较。结果 结果显示,针对靠近船中布置的烟囱结构,传统的针对尾机型的烟囱结构强度校核方法不适用,计算误差可达80%以上,且结果偏危险;但现行的针对船中烟囱的结构强度校核方法计算结果偏保守;相较而言两种新方法的计算结果明显更接近全船有限元计算结果。结论相对于传统校核方法,提出的两种新方法的计算结果更加精确,传统的针对船中烟囱的结构强度校核方法依然具有可用性,但计算结果过于保守,会造成一定程度的材料浪费。

     

    Abstract: Objective To address the applicability issues of traditional chimney structural strength verification methods caused by the combined effects of local loads and hull girder loads in the vicinity of the ship’s midsection, two novel methods for structural strength verification of chimneys located near the ship’s midsection are proposed.Methods Four methods were employed to evaluate the structural strength of the chimney area: the traditional method for aft-engine-room chimneys, which considers only local loads; the current method for mid-ship chimneys, which separately calculates local loads and hull girder loads and then superimposes the resulting stresses; a new method that considers all possible combinations of local and hull girder loads; and another new method that applies a simplified correction to the hull girder load under combined loading conditions. The results from these four methods were compared against those obtained from a full-ship finite element analysis. Results The results indicate that the traditional method, originally designed for aft-engine-room chimneys, is unsuitable for chimneys located near the ship’s midsection, yielding calculation errors exceeding 80% and producing overly conservative (dangerous) results. In contrast, the current method for mid-ship chimneys yields overly conservative results. By comparison, the two newly proposed methods demonstrate significantly closer agreement with the full-ship finite element analysis results. Conclusion Compared with traditional methods, the two newly proposed methods provide more accurate predictions. Although the current method for mid-ship chimneys remains usable, its overly conservative nature leads to unnecessary material waste.

     

/

返回文章
返回