基于RHC-TVLQG-AR算法的舰载机着舰控制

Carrier based aircraft landing control based on RHC-TVLQG-AR algorithm

  • 摘要:
    目的 为实现复杂海况和舰尾流干扰条件下的精确着舰控制,提出一种RHC-TVLQG-AR算法。
    方法 根据滚动时域控制的思想,将着舰控制问题转化为滚动时域内的跟踪控制问题。在每一个时间窗口内,基于AR模型对理想着舰点运动进行在线精确预估,并将理想着舰点的预估运动信号加入到舰载机在当前时间窗口内的导引律中,然后以求解的控制序列中第一个时间步的控制信号作为舰载机的控制输入,从而得到舰载机在下一个时间步的状态。将时间窗口向后移动一个时间步,更新初始状态后,采用上一个时间窗口中的方法对当前时间窗口内的跟踪控制问题进行再次求解。通过时间窗口的一步步后移,最终实现对舰载机的精确着舰控制。
    结果 根据舰载机在不同初始条件和不同海况下的着舰仿真结果可知,该算法下触舰点与理想着舰点的偏差在3.57 m以内,比LQG方法具有更高的跟踪精度、更快的跟踪速度和更好的灵活性。
    结论 该算法可在复杂海况下实现满足输入约束的精确着舰控制。

     

    Abstract:
    Objectives To achieve precise landing control under complex sea conditions and ship wake interference, an RHC-TVLQG-AR (receding horizon control-time varying linear quadratic Gaussian-autoregressive model) algorithm is proposed.
    Methods Based on the idea of receding horizon control (RHC), the landing control problem is transformed into a tracking control problem within the receding horizon. In each time window, the autoregressive (AR) model is used to accurately predict the movement of the ideal landing point online, and the predicted movement signal of the ideal landing point is incorporated into the guidance law of the carrier-based aircraft in the current time window. Then, the control signal at the first time step of the solved control sequence is used as the control input of the carrier-based aircraft to obtain the state of the carrier-based aircraft at the next time step. The time window is shifted backward by one time step, and after updating the initial state, the tracking control problem in the current time window is solved again using the method in the previous time window. Through the step-by-step backward shift of the time window, precise landing control of the carrier-based aircraft is finally achieved.
    Results According to the landing simulation results of the carrier-based aircraft under different initial conditions and sea conditions, the deviation between the touchdown point and the ideal landing point under this algorithm is within 3.57 m, which has higher tracking accuracy, faster tracking speed and better flexibility than the LQG method.
    Conclusions The algorithm can realize precise landing control satisfying input constraints under complex sea conditions.

     

/

返回文章
返回