基于模型试验的FDPSO船动力性能及垂荡抑制研究:垂荡板布置对其影响的综合分析

Research on dynamic performance and heave suppression of FDPSO vessel based on model tests: a comprehensive analysis of influence of heave plate arrangements

  • 摘要:
    目的 研究新型深水八角浮式钻井生产储卸油轮(FDPSO)在不同垂荡板布置下的动力性能,为我国南海 FDPSO 设计提供指导。
    方法 采用1:60 缩尺比制作模型,设置单层垂荡板、不同间距双层垂荡板,开展自由衰减测试、白噪声测试、一年一遇和百年一遇风浪流联合作用测试,测量 FDPSO 重心处六自由度运动、系泊系统载荷、典型位置加速度等。
    结果 结果表明,单层垂荡板浮体运动固有周期最小,垂荡无因次阻尼比最大;双层垂荡板综合考虑增阻效果和垂荡板出水问题,最佳无量纲间距选定为λ = 0.5;λ = 0.5的双层垂荡板的幅频响应算子(RAO)峰值大于单层垂荡板;百年一遇海况下双层垂荡板有出水和上浪现象,单层垂荡板运动抑制效果更好,浮体运动、系缆力、典型位置加速度均小于双层垂荡板;一年一遇海况不同垂荡板设置锚链力相差不大,百年一遇海况下单层垂荡板锚链力明显小于双层垂荡板。
    结论 综合各项测试,单层垂荡板在运动抑制方面表现更优,实际设计可考虑采用单层垂荡板布置形式,但双层垂荡板间距确定还需更详细的试验分析。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective This paper studies the dynamic performance of a new deep-water octagonal floating drilling production storage and offloading (FDPSO) unit under different heave plate arrangements to provide guidance for the design of an FDPSO in the South China Sea.
    Method Models are made with a scale ratio of 1:60. Single-layer and double-layer heave plates with different spacings are set up. Free decay tests, white noise tests, and combined wind-wave-current tests for one-year and one-hundred-year return periods are carried out. The six-degree-of-freedom motion at the center of gravity of the FDPSO, mooring system loads, acceleration at typical positions, etc. are measured.
    Results The results show that the single-layer heave plate has the smallest natural period of floating body motion and the largest dimensionless damping ratio for heave. Considering the drag-increasing effect and the problem of heave plate emergence, the optimal non-dimensional spacing for the double-layer heave plate is selected as λ = 0.5. The peak response amplitude operator (RAO) of the double-layer heave plate with λ = 0.5 is greater than that of the single-layer heave plate. Under the one-hundred-year return period sea state, the double-layer heave plate shows emergence and wave climbing phenomena, while the single-layer heave plate has a better motion suppression effect with smaller floating body motion, mooring force, and acceleration at typical positions than those of the double-layer heave plate. In the one-year return period sea state, the difference in anchor chain forces for different heave plate arrangements is not significant, and in the one-hundred-year return period sea state, the anchor chain force of the single-layer heave plate is significantly smaller than that of the double-layer heave plate.
    Conclusion Based on various tests, the single-layer heave plate has better motion suppression performance. In actual design, the single-layer heave plate arrangement can be considered, but a more detailed experimental analysis is required to determine the spacing of the double-layer heave plate.

     

/

返回文章
返回