The state analysis and technical development routes for the anti-explosion and shock technology of naval ships

LIU Jianhu; ZHOU Xintao; PAN Jianqiang; WANG Haikun

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-3185.2016.01.007

Volume 11 Issue 1

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Chinese Journal of Ship Research > 2016 > 11(1): 46-56,71

LIU Jianhu, ZHOU Xintao, PAN Jianqiang, WANG Haikun. The state analysis and technical development routes for the anti-explosion and shock technology of naval ships[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2016, 11(1): 46-56,71. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3185.2016.01.007

Citation:

PDF( 2078 KB)

The state analysis and technical development routes for the anti-explosion and shock technology of naval ships

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3185.2016.01.007

1 China Ship Scientific Research Center, Wuxi 214082, China;
2 China Ship Development and Design Center, Wuhan 430064, China

Received Date: 2015-06-13
Publish Date: 2016-02-08

Abstract

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The Anti-Explosion and Shock Capability (AESC) of naval ships or submarines is a primary in-dex that influences the comprehensive marine performance and is an important prerequisite of the surviv-ability, which can directly affect the performance of combat effectiveness. The AESC of naval ships or sub-marines of our country is poorer than that of the developed countries and needs immediate and overall en-hancement. The task involves resource assignment, technological development, and management measure-ment, where the technology is the key, and the technical routine is of vital significance. In this paper, some viewpoints are proposed on the technical routine of enhancing the AESC of naval ships or submarines. First, the status and the tendency of the AESC of inner and abroad naval ships and submarines are re-viewed from the aspect of technology. Next, the key problems hindering the AESC enhancement are ana-lyzed. Finally, certain proposals are presented for the technical routine of enhancing the AESC according to the works with different importance and emergency. In brief, the proposals serve as good references for the research, design, and assessment of enhancing the AESC of naval ships and submarines.
- naval ship,
- Anti-Explosion and Shock Capability(AESC),
- vulnerability,
- recoverability,
- survivability

FullText(HTML)

References(16)

References

[1]	PUSEY H C. Technical information support for surviv-ability[J]. The Shock and Vibration Bulletin,1983, 53(1):21-31.
[2]	SAID M O. Theory and practice of total ship survivabili-ty for ship design[J]. Naval Engineers Journal,1995, 107(4):191-203.
[3]	HERING F S. United states fleet survivability of US na-val combatant ship[J]. The Shock and Vibration Bulle-tin,1983,53(1):16-20.
[4]	BEACH J E,BRUCHMAN D D,SIKORA J P. Ad-vanced double hull concept reduces costs,increases capabilities[J]. AMPTIAC Quarterly,2003,7(3): 5-11.
[5]	POTTER P. Surface ships put composites to work[J]. AMPTIAC Quarterly,2003,7(3):37-40.
[6]	BARSOUM R G S. The best of both worlds:hybrid ship hulls use composites and steel [J]. AMPTIAC Quarterly,2003,7(3):55-61.
[7]	BARSOUM R G S. Hybrid composite and metallic hulls-affordability, stealth, strength and durability[C]/ASNE Engineering the Total Ship(ETS)Sympo-sium. McLean,VA,2008.
[8]	VAN AANHOLD J,PEL S,KAPPEL E,et al. Design for UNDEX survivability of an integrated modular mast[C]/78th Shock and Vibration Symposium,SAVIAC Unlimited Distribution Proceedings. Philadelphia,PA, 2007.
[9]	DOWNEY J. DDG 1000 class destroyer[R]. The Amer-ican Society of Naval Engineers(ASNE),Flagship Section,2013.
[10]	PARK J W. Underwater explosion testing of catama-ran-like structure vs. simulation and feasibility of us-ing scaling law[D]. Korea:Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology,2012.
[11]	BANKS S. Submarine propulsor technical develop-ments, opportunities and challenges[C]/Warship 2011: Naval Submarines and UUVs. Bath, UK,2011.
[12]	张树吉,凌如镛,蔡秀生. 舰船生命力技术的若干新概念[J].舰船科学技术,1996(5):1-7.
[13]	HARNEY R C. Broadening the trade space in design-ing for warship survivability[J]. Naval Engineers Journal,2010,122(1):49-63.
[14]	COPLEY S M,REUTZEL E W,MERDES T A,et al. Design,manufacturing, and testing of an im-proved watertight door for surface ships[J]. Naval En-gineers Journal,2010,122(4):93-103.
[15]	EVANGELOS K. Optimization of the survivability of naval ships by genetic algorithms[C]/3rd Euro-Con-ference on Computer Applications and Information Technologies in the Maritime Industries. Siguenza, Spain,2004.
[16]	CULLIS I G,SCHOFIELD J,WHITBY A. Assess-ment of blast loading effects-types of explosion and loading effects[J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping,2010,87(9):493-503.