Optimal selection of ship's main engine based on interactive weighting and evidential reasoning

Zhao Ruijia; Xie Xinlian; Zhao Jiabao; Wang Zhixiang

doi:10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.01512

Volume 14 Issue 5

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Abstract

References

Chinese Journal of Ship Research > 2019 > 14(5): 22-27. > DOI: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.01512 CSTR: 32390.14.j.issn.1673-3185.01512

Zhao Ruijia, Xie Xinlian, Zhao Jiabao, Wang Zhixiang. Optimal selection of ship's main engine based on interactive weighting and evidential reasoning[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2019, 14(5): 22-27. DOI: 10.19693/j.issn.1673-3185.01512

Citation:

PDF (1318 KB)

Optimal selection of ship's main engine based on interactive weighting and evidential reasoning

1.
Integrated Transport Institute, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China
2.
Logistics Research Institute, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China

More Information

Received Date: January 12, 2019
Available Online: May 07, 2021

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Graphical Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Objectives The optimal selection of ship's main engine is a problem worthy of further study, and also a complicated problem on multi-attribute decision making.
Methods The criteria system of optimal selection of a ship's main engine was proposed by deeply analyzing the influence factors of the ship's main engine selection. The objective weight was calculated by entropy weight method. And the subjective weight was calculated by deviation entropy model. Then an interactive weighting method was presented to calculate the comprehensive weight of the ship's main engine selection criteria system, which unified the objective weight and the subjective weight. Finally, the evidential reasoning approach was used to fuse information to sort and select the best one from the options.
Results The method above was proved to be effective and correct by taking the optimal selection of the main engine in the ship building project of a waterway administration as an example. What's more, the influence rule that the interval selection has on utility value of evaluation results, is further explored.
Conclusions The results show that the combination of interactive weighting and evidential reasoning can provide theoretical support for ship main engine type selection design。
- optimal selection of ship's main engine,
- interactive weighting,
- entropy weight method,
- deviation entropy model,
- evidential reasoning

FullText(HTML)

References (13)

References

[1]	丛岩, 宋立国, 潘新祥, 等.营运船舶主机能效和碳排放等级评定方法[J].中国舰船研究, 2019, 14(1):114-119. http://www.ship-research.com/CN/abstract/abstract1909.shtml Cong Y, Song L G, Pan X X, et al. Study on method for rating of energy efficiency and carbon emission intensity of on-service ships[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2019, 14(1):114-119(in Chinese). http://www.ship-research.com/CN/abstract/abstract1909.shtml
[2]	达勇, 张跃文, 张鹏, 等.基于EEDI的船舶主机选型研究[J].舰船科学技术, 2016, 38(5):96-100, 104. doi: 10.3404/j.issn.1672-7619.2016.05.021 Da Y, Zhang Y W, Zhang P, et al. Research on marine engine selection based on ship energy efficiency design index[J]. Ship Science and Technology, 2016, 38(5):96-100, 104(in Chinese). doi: 10.3404/j.issn.1672-7619.2016.05.021
[3]	陈伟南, 黄连忠, 张勇, 等.基于BP神经网络的船舶主机能效状态评估[J].中国舰船研究, 2018, 13(4):127-133, 160. http://www.ship-research.com/CN/abstract/abstract1842.shtml Chen W N, Huang L Z, Zhang Y, et al. Evaluation of main engine energy efficiency based on BP neural network[J]. Chinese Journal of Ship Research, 2018, 13(4):127-133, 160(in Chinese). http://www.ship-research.com/CN/abstract/abstract1842.shtml
[4]	李刚, 李建平, 孙晓蕾, 等.主客观权重的组合方式及其合理性研究[J].管理评论, 2017, 29(12):17-26, 61. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/glpl201712002 Li G, Li J P, Sun X L, et al. Research on a combined method of subjective-objective weighing and the its rationality[J]. Management Review, 2017, 29(12):17-26, 61(in Chinese). http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/glpl201712002
[5]	迟国泰, 李鸿禧, 潘明道.基于违约鉴别能力组合赋权的小企业信用评级——基于小型工业企业样本数据的实证分析[J].管理科学学报, 2018, 21(3):105-126. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9807.2018.03.008 Chi G T, Li H X, Pan M D. Small enterprises credit rating based on default identification ability of combination weighting:based on an empirical analysis of small industrial enterprises[J]. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2018, 21(3):105-126(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9807.2018.03.008
[6]	何大义, 陈小玲, 许加强.多属性群决策问题中基于最小叉熵的权重集成方法[J].控制与决策, 2017, 32(2):378-384. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/kzyjc201702027 He D Y, Chen X L, Xu J Q. Weight aggregation method based on principle of minimum cross-entropy in multiple attribute group decision-making[J]. Control and Decision, 2017, 32(2):378-384(in Chinese). http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/kzyjc201702027
[7]	桑松, 李华军, 董胜.交互式多目标决策方法及其在海洋平台方案综合优选中的应用[J].船舶力学, 2006, 10(4):54-59. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7294.2006.04.009 Sang S, Li H J, Dong S. Interactive multi-objective decision-making method and its application in preferred marine platforms[J]. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 2006, 10(4):54-59(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7294.2006.04.009
[8]	祝志川.基于变异系数-G1法的混合交叉赋权方法[J].统计与决策, 2017(12):78-81. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/tjyjc201712018 Zhu Z C. Hybrid cross-weighting method based on coefficient of variation-G1 method[J]. Statistics and Decision, 2017(12):78-81(in Chinese). http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/tjyjc201712018
[9]	Bao T T, Xie X L, Long P Y, et al. MADM method based on prospect theory and evidential reasoning approach with unknown attribute weights under intuitionistic fuzzy environment[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2017, 88:305-317. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.07.012
[10]	Saaty T L. The modern science of multi-criteria decision making and its practical applications:the AHP/ANP approach[J]. Operations Research, 2013, 61(5):1101-1118. doi: 10.1287/opre.2013.1197
[11]	Rezaei J. Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method[J]. Omega, 2015, 53:49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009
[12]	郑建湖, 伍雄斌, 黄明芳, 等.有偏好的多属性灰色关联路径选择模型[J].交通运输系统工程与信息, 2014, 14(4):168-172. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6744.2014.04.024 Zheng J H, Wu X B, Huang M F, et al. Grey relational analysis for multi-attributes decision making of route choice with subjective preference[J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, 2014, 14(4):168-172(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6744.2014.04.024
[13]	Xie X L, Xu D L, Yang J B, et al. Ship selection using a multiple-criteria synthesis approach[J]. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 2008, 13(1):50-62. doi: 10.1007/s00773-007-0259-4

Cited By

Citation

XML

PDF in Chinese

Article views (530) PDF downloads (78)

Optimal selection of ship's main engine based on interactive weighting and evidential reasoning

Abstract

References

Catalog

Related

Optimal selection of ship's main engine based on interactive weighting and evidential reasoning

Abstract

References

Catalog

Related

Export File

Citation

Format

Content